(It’s best to read Parts ONE and TWO first)



Picture the first production of Macbeth at Holyrood house…….

…..with King James in attendance, sitting in state….

Enter the witches round a bubbling cauldron………


…….constructing a destructive spell……..

…….just like the Satanical conspirators of North Berwick….

north berwick witches (3)

But unlike King James, the witches have unleashed something in Macbeth that was lurking there anyway…..

FIRST WITCH (Amanda Walker)

Thrice the brinded cat hath mew’d.

SECOND WITCH (Kate Godfrey)

Thrice and once the hedge-pig whined.

THIRD WITCH (Karen Little)

Harpier cries ‘Tis time, ’tis time’.


Round about the cauldron go;

In the poison’d entrails throw.

Toad, that under cold stone

Days and nights has thirty-one

Swelter’d venom sleeping got,

Boil thou first i’ the charmed pot.


Double, double toil and trouble;

Fire burn, and cauldron bubble


Fillet of a fenny snake,

In the cauldron boil and bake;

Eye of newt and toe of frog,

Wool of bat and tongue of dog,

Adder’s fork and blind-worm’s sting,

Lizard’s leg and owlet’s wing,

For a charm of powerful trouble,

Like a hell-broth boil and bubble.


Double, double toil and trouble;

Fire burn and cauldron bubble…………..


Scale of dragon, tooth of wolf,

Witches’ mummy, maw and gulf

Of the ravin’d salt-sea shark,

Root of hemlock digg’d i’ the dark,

Liver of blaspheming Jew,

Gall of goat, and slips of yew

Silver’d in the moon’s eclipse,

Nose of Turk and Tartar’s lips,

Finger of birth-strangled babe

Ditch-deliver’d by a drab,

Make the gruel thick and slab:

Add thereto a tiger’s chaudron,

For the ingredients of our cauldron.


Double, double toil and trouble;

Fire burn and cauldron bubble.


Cool it with a baboon’s blood,

Then the charm is firm and goo

By the pricking of my thumbs,

Something wicked this way comes.

Open, locks, Whoever knocks…


Macbeth arrives to consult the witches…………

……….exactly the way Queen Elizabeth used to ride to Mortlake to consult her own wizard, John Dee…


MACBETH (Mike Burnside)

How now, you secret, black, and midnight hags! What is’t you do?


A deed without a name.


I conjure you, by that which you profess,

Howe’er you come to know it, answer me:

Though you untie the winds and let them fight

Against the churches; though the yesty waves

Confound and swallow navigation up;

Answer me to what I ask you.






We’ll answer.


Say, if thou’dst rather hear it from our mouths,

Or from our masters?


Call ’em; let me see ’em.


And so the witches summon up their familiar spirits, just as Agnes Sampson did….


Pour in sow’s blood, that hath eaten

Her nine farrow; grease that’s sweaten

From the murderer’s gibbet throw

Into the flame.


Come, high or low;

Thyself and office deftly show….


A floating head appears – just as had been reported to James before his mother’s execution….

armed head


Tell me, thou unknown power,–


He knows thy thought:

Hear his speech, but say thou nought.


The floating head utters a prophecy which the play reveals to be completely true:


Macbeth! Macbeth! Macbeth! beware Macduff;

Beware the thane of Fife. Dismiss me. Enough


Whate’er thou art, for thy good caution, thanks;

Thou hast harp’d my fear aright: but one word more,–


The witches then show their power over Macbet……

…….just as Agnes showed her power over King James….


He will not be commanded: here’s another,

More potent than the first.


The second apparition appears – a bloody Child.

bloody child macbeth


Macbeth! Macbeth! Macbeth!


Had I three ears, I’d hear thee.


Be bloody, bold, and resolute; laugh to scorn

The power of man, for none of woman born

Shall harm Macbeth.


The bloody child represents Macduff torn from his mother’s womb!

Another witches’ prophesy which the play proves correct…


Then live, Macduff: what need I fear of thee?

But yet I’ll make assurance double sure,

And take a bond of fate: thou shalt not live;

That I may tell pale-hearted fear it lies, And sleep in spite of thunder.


The Third Apparition appears: a Child crowned, with a tree in his hand….

child with tree macbeth

Macbeth will soon discover who this is….


What is this That rises like the issue of a king,

And wears upon his baby-brow the round

And top of sovereignty?


Listen, but speak not to’t.


Be lion-mettled, proud; and take no care

Who chafes, who frets, or where conspirers are:

Macbeth shall never vanquish’d be until

Great Birnam wood to high Dunsinane hill

Shall come against him.

Again a prophecy that James sees enacted before his eyes….


That will never be! Who can impress the forest, bid the tree

Unfix his earth-bound root? Sweet bodements! good!

Rebellion’s head, rise never till the wood

Of Birnam rise, and our high-placed Macbeth

Shall live the lease of nature, pay his breath

To time and mortal custom.

Yet my heart Throbs to know one thing: tell me, if your art

Can tell so much: shall Banquo’s issue ever

Reign in this kingdom?


Seek to know  no more!


I will be satisfied: deny me this,

And an eternal curse fall on you!

(Witches laugh)

Let me know.

Why sinks that cauldron? and what noise is this?








Show his eyes, and grieve his heart;

Come like shadows, so depart!


A procession of Kings begins…

witches coven Macbeth

Now Macbeth discovers who the child with the crown was –

…………the start of the Stuart line!


Thou art too like the spirit of Banquo: down!

Thy crown does sear mine eye-balls. And thy hair,

Thou other gold-bound brow, is like the first.

A third is like the former. Filthy hags!

Why do you show me this? A fourth! Start, eyes!

What, will the line stretch out to the crack of doom?

Another yet! A seventh! I’ll see no more:

And yet the eighth appears, who bears a glass

Which shows me many more…..


The eighth King holds a great mirror so it reflects King James, sitting in state in the audience…..


Some I see

That two-fold balls and treble sceptres carry……


The orbs of Scotland AND England –

…….and the single coronation sceptre of Scotland……….

single sceptre scotland

…… and the double coronation sceptres of England…

double sceptres


Horrible sight! Now, I see, ’tis true;

For the blood-bolter’d Banquo smiles upon me,

And points at them for his.


The apparitions vanish.


What, is this so?


Ay, sir, all this is so: but why

Stands Macbeth thus amazedly?

Come, sisters, cheer we up his sprites,

And show the best of our delights:

I’ll charm the air to give a sound,

While you perform your antic round:

That this great king may kindly say,

Our duties did his welcome pay.


The witches dance – on exactly the same spot in Holyrood house where the Berwick witches danced – and then vanish.

In every prophesy they are proved to be right…

…..as Agnes Sampson was….

Invade England!……

The witches are saying……

You will establish a line of Kings that will exist unto the end of time!

But, of course, James DIDN’T invade England. He was far too canny for that.

He knew in a few years Elizabeth would die and the crown would become his without a struggle….

So Shakespeare needn’t have bothered writing this play at all…

But I’m awfully glad he did!



For an encore, the ENTIRE COMPANY recited The Night I appeared as Macbeth

 ……..by William Hargreaves…..

………with additions by Fenton Gray.…..


For most of my life I confess it

I’ve had no desire for the stage

But one fatal night I was asked to recite

Gadzooks I was quickly the rage!


I thought that Macbeth was the one role

That would certainly make my career,

And my friends said ‘Of course you must do it,

As long as you don’t do it here!’


So I went, hired a hall,

Then gave a performance that shattered them all…


I acted so tragic the house rose like magic

The audience yelled….


You’re sublime!


They made me a present of Mornington Crescent

They threw it a brick at a time


The crowd filled the air with their clatter and chatter

And threw an assortment of vegetable matter.

They queered me, they cheered me,

And they cheered at the scene of my death

I got no ‘Hosannahs’ – just eggs and bananas


The night I appeared as Macbeth!


The play tho’ ascribed to Bill Shakespeare,

To me lacked both polish and tone

So I threw in some bits of some popular hits

And a few comic lines of my own


Unfortunately the director

Decided the play was too long

So he forced me to cut out my clog dance

And half of my second act song!


And the flowers! What a feast!

They threw them in bag-fulls – self-raising and yeast….


I acted so tragic the house rose like magic

An evening of mayhem and thrills,

My tender emotion caused such a commotion

The Dress Circle wrote out their wills.


They hooted like hounds and they whistled like crickets

Especially those who had paid for their tickets,

The witches, were in stitches

And five of the band met their death

I cried ‘Lay on Macduff’

They cried:



Lay orf! Enuff!


The night I appeared as Macbeth!


the night I appeared


 Brothers and Sister of The Code who enjoyed this might like previous Grosvenor Chapel talks….

(1.) Shakespeare, Love Politics and Religion

A Series of Three Talks which cover the Life and Career of William Shakespeare.

(2.) How Shakespeare’s Dark Lady found God

A Talk which deals with Aemelia Lanyer – Shakespeare’s capricious, dark-skinned mistress who, The Code argues, was the secret author of the satire against men, Willobie his Avisa.

(3.)  Fairie Lore and Roman Catholicism in ‘A Midsummer Night’s Dream’.

A Talk which shows how Fairie Lore was a coded reference to Roman Catholicisim in ‘A Midsummer Night’s Dream’.

And here is Fenton Gray…..

fenton gray

……. performing his adaptation of ‘The Night I appeared as Macbeth.’


A miniature by Ian Oliver….

……. of Henry Wriothesley, Third Earl of Southampton……

……has been sold at auction for £181,250….

henry wriothesley new miniatureIt has fallen into private hands…..

To read the Third and Final part of……

‘Something Wicked This Way Comes…..

…..New Light on the Witches in Macbeth’…..

Please click: HERE!

But it’s best to read Part One and Part Two first.

[It’s best to read PART ONE first]


So what was REALLY going on in the kirk at North Berwick?

north berwick witches (4)

Well, I can tell you, the academic world doesn’t have a clue.  

Perhaps, at this late stage, we may never know. But what it important for us is what people THOUGHT was going on.

James really believed in witches. He describes them in his Demonologie as….

KING JAMES (Mike Burnside)

Detestable slaves of the Devil!


….and says, of witchcraft, that…..


Such devilish arts have been and ARE!!!


In 1597, though, James had his doubts. One poacher-turned-gamekeeper, the great witch of Balwelly, Margaret Aitken, declared that she could tell a fellow witch by looking into her eyes. Dozens of women were sent to their deaths.

James only discovered that she was a fraud when she declared the same woman to be both a witch and not a witch on successive days….

James, to his credit, called off that whole witch hunt. But he tightened the witch laws in England when he became King there in 1603 and witchcraft became punishable by death.

James never for a second lost his belief that witches, and wise women, could see into the future……

….. and he tried to gain that power for himself.

John Harington, Queen Elizabeth’s godson……

sir john harington

……..famous for having invented the water-closet……….

……..recorded a remarkable conversation he had with the King in 1607………


He inquired much of my learning, and showed me his own, in such manner, as made me remember my examiner at Cambridge afore-time. His Majesty did much press for my opinion touching the power of Satan in matter of witchcraft; and asked me, with much gravity…..


Do you truly understand why the devil works more with ancient women than others?


I did not refrain from a scurvy jest…..

AMANDA (as herself)

 But we will refrain from it here at the Grosvenor Chapel….

HARINGTON continues….

More serious discourse did next ensue, wherein I wanted room to continue, and sometime room to escape; for the Queen, his mother, Mary Queen of Scots, was not forgotten, nor Davison, neither….

KAREN (as herself)

William Davison was Queen Elizabeth’s secretary, whom Elizabeth blamed for Mary’s execution…


My mother’s death was visible in Scotland before it did really happen. It was spoken of in secret by those whose power of sight presented to them a bloody head dancing in the air…..


He then did remark much on this gift, and said he had sought out of certain books a sure way to attain knowledge of future chances himself. Hereat he named many books, which I did not know, or by whom written…..We next discoursed somewhat on religion…I made courtesy hereat, and out at the gate.

…..I did forget to tell, that his Majesty much asked concerning my opinion of the new weed tobacco, and said….


It will, by its use, infuse ill qualities on…. the BRAIN! No learned man ought to taste it. I wish it forbidden.


By 1607, James was Shakespeare’s boss and William and his acting company Grooms of the Chamber. But as we have seen, Shakespeare had already met James in Edinburgh in 1599. So why was he there?

The answer, as ever, was politics.

Those who have been coming to these talks, since Father Oakley asked me to start them six years ago, will know that I believe that Shakespeare was an intimate friend of the Earl of Southampton……

Southampton in armour

…… and part of his entourage…..

This meant he was also friends with Southampton’s friends – the Earl of Essex, (the Queen’s favourite)

essex in white


…….Baron Mountjoy (the Queen’s ex-favourite)……..

Charles Blount Lord Mountjoyu


…….and the beautiful, dark-eyed, Lady Penelope Rich (the Queen’s bête-noire).

penelope rich

Lady Penelope was also Essex’s sister, Mountjoy’s lover and Shakespeare’s leading lady in some of the first, private, performances of his plays at Titchfield.

Southampton, Essex, Mountjoy and Penelope were the Elizabethan Gang of Four, bound in friendship – and FEAR!

Queen Elizabeth refused point blank to name her successor. They were terrified Civil war would break out when she died. Or, worse still, a foreign king or queen would take over the throne….

So the Gang wanted to ensure that King James of Scotland would become King James of England as well….

He was Catholic-friendly – which pleased Shakespeare and Southampton – and he wanted to unite Scotland with England which pleased them all.

So in 1598, Essex and Penelope started to write secretly, in code, to King James. Queen Elizabeth was referred to as……


…..and Essex….

the Weary Knight……..

…..weary of trying to satisfy the massive sexual desires of the aging queen….

Penelope called herself


…..and King James was given the codename……


Victor, it was hoped, over Elizabeth…..

By the autumn of 1599, though, things were looking desperate for the Gang. Essex was entirely out of favour with Elizabeth. He’d not only failed to quell the rebellion over in Ireland: he’d had a secret parley with the rebel leader, the Earl of Tyrone….



When word of this reached the Court, Essex rushed back to England and burst into the Queen’s bed-chamber. Elizabeth was furious – not so much because Essex had deserted his post but because he’d seen her without her wig and make-up….

Still from Benjamin Britten's opera 'Gloriana'.

Still from Benjamin Britten’s opera ‘Gloriana’.

Essex was placed under house arrest and Mountjoy sent to Ireland replace him.

The Gang conceived a daring plan. Mountjoy would bring over from Ireland one half of the Queen’s army, King James would march, at the head of his, to the Borders of Scotland. There he would publish an open letter to the English government of his right to the Succession… If his demand was refused, he would invade….

To persuade James to take part, they sent him their secret weapon – William Shakespeare – and HIS secret weapon – the tragedy of Macbeth….

Now I know most people think that Macbeth was written and performed during the English reign of James. But the great Shakespeare scholar, John Dover Wilson, produced a massive body of evidence to show that not only was Macbeth written during the reign of Elizabeth – but it was also first performed in Edinburgh. The only difference between us is that Dover Wilson thinks it was 1601 – and I, following Guthrie of Brechin, think it was 1599.

My belief is that Shakespeare RETURNED to Scotland in 1601….

But why did Shakespeare and the Gang think Macbeth would persuade James to invade England? It’s important to know that James believed what many people at the time believed – that time was cyclical. As he wrote to his son, Prince Henry…


By reading of authentic histories and chronicles, you shall learn experience by theoric, applying the by-past things to the present estate, quia nihil nunc dici aut fieri, quod non dictum et factum fit prius…Since nothing is spoken or done which has not been spoken or done before….


So when James watched Macbeth he would be automatically comparing it with events in his own life-time. This resonance was made even more powerful by the fact that Banquo was the founder of James’s own line of Kings – the Stuarts.

In Holinshed, Banquo helps Macbeth murder King Duncan – but in Shakespeare’s version Banquo is loyal, wise and brave – just like King James – or rather, how the Gang of Four wanted King James to be….

For the truth of the matter is that James, naturally bookish, would scream if anyone drew a sword in his presence. He even advised his son to wear light armour in battle so he could the more easily run away….

So, one of Shakespeare’s aims in writing Macbeth was to show King James that war was glorious. Shakespeare had written Henry V earlier in the year……..

Chris Mills as Henry V in 'The Making of a King'.

Chris Mills as Henry V in ‘The Making of a King’.

…… and Macbeth does for Scottish patriotism what Henry V had done for English patriotism. 

War is shown in the play as an opportunity to display bravery and loyalty. 

Macbeth, the soldier, without hesitation, ‘unseams’ the rebel Macdonwald ‘from the nave to the chops’ then cuts off his head and fixes it on the castle’s battlements. For this he is rewarded by King Duncan with a new title and he enjoys the…….

…..golden opinions……

….. of his countrymen and women……

By implication, these ‘golden opinions’ would also be won by King James if he were to invade England…

But Shakespeare needs to convince James of the rightness of the action as well: Queen Elizabeth, after all, was related to James through King Henry VII.

Elizabeth herself was also an anointed monarch….

elizabeth as virgin

……and James believed in the Divine Right of Kings.

Shakespeare sets about his task by employing codes. Scotland, in the topsy-turvy, fair is foul world of Macbeth is really England.  And England is really Scotland…

When England invades Scotland to put down Scottish tyranny, it’s really Scotland invading England to put down English tyranny…

The murder of the saintly King Duncan, when a guest in the home of the Macbeths, is a coded re-run of the execution of James’s mother, Mary Queen of Scots, when she had been a ‘guest’ in the land of Queen Elizabeth.

mary q of s execution

Lord and Lady Macbeth, as the play progresses, begin to embody many of the characteristics of Queen Elizabeth….Here are eight of them….

(1.) Her hesitation.

Macbeth hesitates before killing Duncan, weighing up the pros and cons……


He’s here in double trust:

First, as I am his kinsman and his subject,

Strong both against the deed; then as his host,

Who should against his murtherer shut the door,

Not bear the knife myself.


Elizabeth, described by contemporary historian, William Camden, as…..

….a woman naturally slow in her resolutions…

…..dithered about the execution of Mary Queen of Scots in the same way…

In the midst of these doubtful and perplexed thoughts, which so troubled and staggered the Queen’s mind that she gave herself over wholly to solitariness, sat many times melancholic and mute and frequently sighing muttered to herself, ‘Aut fer aut feri’…..either bear with her or smite her… And ‘ne feriare, feri’ – Strike lest thou be stricken

These troubled speech patterns are echoed in many of Macbeth’s speeches:


This supernatural soliciting

Cannot be ill, cannot be good: if ill,

Why hath it given me earnest of success,

Commencing in a truth? I am thane of Cawdor:

If good, why do I yield to that suggestion

Whose horrid image doth unfix my hair

And make my seated heart knock at my ribs,

Against the use of nature…..

(2.) Her assumption of a masculine role……….

Lady Macbeth says…..

LADY MACBETH (Kate Godfrey)

Come, you spirits

That tend on mortal thoughts, unsex me here,

And fill me from the crown to the toe top-full

Of direst cruelty! make thick my blood;

Stop up the access and passage to remorse,

That no compunctious visitings of nature

Shake my fell purpose, nor keep peace between

The effect and it! Come to my woman’s breasts,

And take my milk for gall, you murdering ministers,

Wherever in your sightless substances

You wait on nature’s mischief! Come, thick night,

And pall thee in the dunnest smoke of hell,

That my keen knife see not the wound it makes,

Nor heaven peep through the blanket of the dark,

To cry ‘Hold, hold!’

unsex me here


Elizabeth would often refer to herself as a ‘Prince’ and in 1560 said to the Swedish Ambassador….

I have the heart of a man and I am not afraid of anything….

Queen Elizabeth, in armour, at Tilbury during the Armada.

Queen Elizabeth, in armour, at Tilbury during the Arm

(3) Her blame-shifting….

Lord and Lady Macbeth put the blame for Duncan’s murder on the two innocent grooms who were guarding the King…

Elizabeth put the blame for the execution of Mary Queen of Scots on her innocent secretary, Davison.

(4) Her use of hit-men….

Macbeth hires two, then three, murderers to kill Banquo.

Elizabeth ordered Sir Amias Paulet and Sir Drue Drury to murder Mary Queen of Scots in secret. The gentlemen declined, to Elizabeth’s fury…

She claimed they were

….lacking in zeal and care….

(5) Her propensity to fits….

Macbeth suffers a fit when he sees the ghost of Banquo at the feast….

ghost banquo feast

Lady Macbeth says to the guests………


…My Lord is often thus,

And hath been from his youth: pray you, keep seat;

The fit is momentary; upon a thought

He will again be well……


Elizabeth suffered from similar fits. She would lie, unconscious and speechless, for hours on end and would often swoon through sheer rage…

On 30 June, 1586, the year before the execution of Mary Queen of Scots, the Spanish Ambassador reported to Philip II how

…when the Queen was going to Chapel, as usual in full magnificence, she was suddenly overcome with a shock of fear, which affected her to such an extent that she at once returned to her apartments, greatly to the wonder of those present.

(6) Her bad dreams….

Macbeth talks about….


…these terrible dreams

That shake us nightly….

…and Lady Macbeth sleepwalks, trying to wash Duncan’s blood from her hands as she exclaims….


Out, damned spot! out, I say!–One: two: why, then, ’tis time to do’t.–Hell is murky!–Fie, my lord, fie! a soldier, and afeard? What need we fear who knows it, when none can call our power to account?–Yet who would have thought the old man to have had so much blood in him……

out damned spot 2


Elizabeth suffered from ‘terrible dreams’ before the execution of Mary Queen of Scots. After she had sent orders to Paulet to murder the Scottish Queen, she was awakened by a violent shriek from the lady who always slept in her bedchamber.


What ails?


I dreamed that I saw the hangman strike off the head of the Queen of Scots; and forthwith he laid hands on Your Majesty, and was about to behead you as well, when I screamed with terror…


I was at the instant you awoke me, dreaming the very same thing…


(7) Her isolation and depression…

Macbeth separates himself more and more from his fellow beings – even his wife – and on hearing of her death, utters words of overwhelming despair…..

gielgud macbeth tomorrow speech


Tomorrow and tomorrow and tomorrow

Creeps in this petty pace from day to day

To the last syllable of recorded time

And all our yesterdays have lighted fools

The way to dusty death. Out, out, brief candle!

Life’s but a walking shadow, a poor player

That struts and frets his hour upon the stage

And then is heard no more. It is a tale

Told by an idiot, full of sound and fury,

Signifying nothing.


Elizabeth suffered severe bouts of depression all her life. She would stay alone in her room trying to ‘shun melancholy’ by playing the lute or the virginals… 

elizabeth and lute

After the execution of Mary, Queen of Scots, in 1587 and the deaths, in the following year, of her lover, the Earl of Leicester………

Middle aged Leicester

…… and the only man who could ‘un-dumpish’ her, her jester, Richard Tarleton…….

Tarleton - large

…..Elizabeth’s depressions became acute.

Lord Burghley, on one occasion, had to smash down the doors of her bed-chamber to get her to eat.

(8) Her propensity to ‘play-act’…

When the murder of King Duncan is discovered, Lady Macbeth, feigning grief and surprise, exclaims


What! in our house

….a response so unnatural that a suspicious Banquo remarks….


Too cruel, anywhere…


Lady Macbeth then proceeds to suffer a fainting fit…

what in our house

Elizabeth had knowingly signed Mary Queen of Scots’s death-warrant. She had even joked about it with her secretary, Davison.

But, according to the Regency historian, Lucy Aikin…

Elizabeth heard the news of Mary’s death with great indignation, her countenance altered, her speech faltered and failed her and through excessive sorrow she stood in a manner astonished; insomuch that she gave herself over to passionate grief, putting herself into mourning habit and shedding abundance of tears….

The same day that the people of London heard that Mary Queen had been beheaded, they made bonfires as though England had gained some victory. Elizabeth put her head out of the window and asked….


What do these bonfires mean?


Mary Queen of Scots is dead, mam….


What? Is my sister dead? And who has put her to death? They have deceived me then…


One nobleman who was present could not help saying…..

See, there, the very trick of a play actress…

And even the contemporary historian, Camden, admits he doesn’t know if Elizabeth’s tears were feigned or not. 

Neither, probably, did Elizabeth…..

So the action of Macbeth shows that Lord and Lady Macbeth are bloodthirsty usurpers of the Scottish throne who deserve to die…

Just as Elizabeth, the bloodthirsty usurper of the English throne deserves to die as well….

James might have been convinced that an invasion of England was morally right …

…but he also needed convincing it would be successful as well….

And this is where the witches really come into their own….

(To read Part Three – the Great Witch Finale – please click: HERE! )
























Introduced by Trixie the Cat


Six years ago, the Revd Mark Oakley….

oakley 2;

…now the Canon Treasurer at St. Paul’s Cathedral….

oakley st. paul's

..was the Priest-in-Charge  of the Grosvenor Chapel…

grosvenor chapel with Peter Pan house

Father Oakley asked Stewart Trotter to give a dramatised talk on Shakespeare…..

This grew to three talks entitled:

‘Shakespeare, Love, Politic and Religion.’

This was based partly on his book, Love’s Labour’s Found….

book cover

…published in 2002…

…….and in turn became the basis for this blog, The Shakespeare Code.

For the last six years, Stewart has given one talk a year at The Grosvenor Chapel….

..and this year the present Priest-in-Charge of the Grosvenor Chapel…….

…..the Revd. Dr. Richard Fermer…

fermer, richard

…..asked Stewart to write another talk.

This was called….

Something Wicked This Way Comes

New Light on the Witches in Macbeth

witch on broomstick

It was given after Mass on All Hallows’ Day, 1st November, 2015….

..in the back rooms of the Grosvenor Chapel….


 ‘Bye, now…

Paw-Print smallest



Ladies and Gentlemen, my name is Stewart Trotter and I should like to introduce the Trotter Players – Amanda Walker, Kate Godfrey, Karen Little – and our guest star, Mike Burnside. ….

We will now undertake the opening scene of Macbeth. Amanda, Kate and Karen will play the three witches. I will play Graymalkin the cat and Mike will play Paddock the toad.

We had considered using Scottish accents in this scene – but thought that might bring the terrible curse of the play down on our heads. So we’re going to be ENGLISH witches and ENGLISH warriors…

Simply by mentioning the Scottish play by name, I have, actors believe, activated its curse: so I shall now neutralise it by employing an ancient theatrical ritual. I shall leave the room, turn round three times, spit, swear a dreadful curse, then knock on the door and plead for re-admittance…..

(Stewart exits, closing the door. Pause: Stewart: One! Two! Three! Spit! Curse!. (Knocks on door). Shouts: ‘Can I come in?’. Stewart re-enters and pauses.)

I declare the curse lifted….

Ladies and gentlemen, it is with some trepidation the Trotter Players now give you the opening scene from Macbeth…..

(Thunder effects from Stewart…Witches stand.)

 FIRST WITCH (Amanda Walker)

When shall we three meet again In thunder, lightning, or in rain?

SECOND WITCH (Kate Godfrey)

When the hurlyburly’s done,

When the battle’s lost and won.

THIRD WITCH (Karen Little)

That will be ere the set of sun.


Where the place?


Upon the heath.


There to meet with Macbeth.

(Stewart miaows insistently)


I come, Graymalkin!

(Mike croaks insistently)


Paddock calls!




Fair is foul, and foul is fair:

Hover through the fog and filthy air.

 three witches


So what do we learn about the witches from this opening scene? Well they clearly love team-work, the great outdoors and filthy weather. They are NOT patriotic: to them the battle against the rebels is simply ‘lost and won’. They are NOT rooting for Scotland. They hover through the air and are martyrs to their pets….

However, what they do have, even in this first scene, is the power of prophecy: they KNOW that the battle will be over by set of sun and they KNOW that they will meet with the great warrior, Macbeth. We shall see that this ability is the CRUCIAL function of the witches in the play.

But why did Shakespeare use witches at all? There are no witches in the other great tragedies – not even in Hamlet – and Denmark at the time was notorious for witchcraft. It still is…

The witches in Macbeth come with the territory. Shakespeare nearly always used someone else’s story for his plays and in the case of Macbeth it’s Raphael Holinshed…..

raphael holinshed

His Chronicles had been first published in 1577….


…but when they were re-published ten years later, Queen Elizabeth had had enough.

She recalled the books on the grounds that they were

….fondly set out.

Holinshed wrote about the reigns of Elizabeth’s predecessors – and Elizabeth didn’t want ANYONE comparing her reign with anybody else’s. She was even more obsessed with her ‘legacy’ than Tony Blair.

blair worried

However, Shakespeare and his patrons got round this censorship by staging the stories: and the story of Macbeth comes ready-packaged with witches….

Mike will now read from Holinshed:


It fortuned as Macbeth and Banquo journeyed towards Forres, where the king then lay, they went hunting by the way together, without other company, passing through the woods and fields, when suddenly in the midst of a land, there met them three women in strange attire, resembling creatures of elder world, whom they attentively beheld, wondering much at the sight….

If you look at the woodcut that accompanies the Holinshed Chronicles…..

holinshed weird sisters

…. the ‘WOMEN’ note – NOT witches – are dressed in clothes that look rather stylish, expensive and fetching….in sharp contrast to – the witches in Macbeth!

(Thunder from Stewart. Witches stand.)


Where hast thou been, sister?


Killing swine.


Sister, where thou?


A sailor’s wife had chestnuts in her lap,

And munch’d, and munch’d, and munch’d:–

‘Give me,’ quoth I:

‘Aroint thee, witch!’ the rump-fed ronyon cries.

Her husband’s to Aleppo gone, master o’ the Tiger:

But in a sieve I’ll thither sail,

And, like a rat without a tail,

I’ll do, I’ll do, and I’ll do.


I’ll give thee a wind.


Thou’rt kind.


And I another.


I myself have all the other,

And the very ports they blow,

All the quarters that they know

I’ the shipman’s card.

I will drain him dry as hay:

Sleep shall neither night nor day

Hang upon his pent-house lid;

He shall live a man forbid:

Weary se’nnights nine times nine

Shall he dwindle, peak and pine:

Though his bark cannot be lost,

Yet it shall be tempest-tost!

Look what I have.


Show me, show me!


Here I have a pilot’s thumb, Wreck’d as homeward he did come.

(Stewart makes drum noises.)


A drum! a drum! Macbeth doth come.


The weird sisters, hand in hand,

Posters of the sea and land,

Thus do go about, about:

Thrice to thine (take three sideways steps to left ) and thrice to mine (take three steps to right)

And thrice again,(take three steps to the left) to make up nine.


Peace! the charm’s wound up.

macbeth meets witches

MACBETH (Mike Burnside)

So foul and fair a day I have not seen, Banquo.

BANQUO (Stewart Trotter)

How far is’t call’d to Forres?

(seeing the witches) What are these

So wither’d and so wild in their attire,

That look not like the inhabitants o’ the earth,

And yet are on’t? Live you? or are you aught

That man may question?

witches lips

You seem to understand me,

By each at once her chappy finger laying

Upon her skinny lips: you should be women,

And yet your beards forbid me to interpret

That you are so.


Speak, if you can: what are you?


All hail, Macbeth! hail to thee, thane of Glamis!



All hail, Macbeth, hail to thee, thane of Cawdor!



All hail, Macbeth, thou shalt be king hereafter!


(Macbeth looks astonished at the news – and tempted by it.)


Good sir, why do you start; and seem to fear

Things that do sound so fair? I’ the name of truth,

Are ye fantastical, or that indeed

Which outwardly ye show?

If you can look into the seeds of time,

And say which grain will grow and which will not,

Speak then to me, who neither beg nor fear

Your favours nor your hate.








Lesser than Macbeth, and greater.


Not so happy, yet much happier.


Thou shalt get kings, though thou be none:

So all hail, Macbeth and Banquo!


Banquo and Macbeth, all hail!


Back to Holinshed….

Herewith the aforesaid women vanished immediately out of their sight. This was reported at first as some vain fantastical illusion: but afterwards the common opinion was, that these women were either the WAYARD Sisters, that is the goddesses of destiny, or else some nymphs or fairies, indued with knowledge of prophesies by their necromantical science, because everything came to pass as they had spoken….


Shakespeare’s witches are far more sinister than Holinshed’s ‘wayard sisters’. As we have just seen, they kill pigs for fun, raise revenge storms for chestnut deprivation and try to cast death spells on war heroes….something Holinshed’s three women would never do…

Why did Shakespeare make these changes?

When I was at school studying Macbeth for O-level – as everyone did in those days – we were told that Shakespeare introduced the witches simply to flatter King James….

king james in robes

The implication was that Shakespeare was a highly intelligent Englishman and that James was a stupid, superstitious Scotsman….

But the truth, of course, was far more complex….

Well, a bit more complex…

The witches in Macbeth have their roots in real events that happened in Scotland in 1589….

Shakespeare would have known about them from a pamphlet called The Newes from Scotland printed in 1591….

newes from scotland

He would also have known about it from King James’s own book about witchcraft called Demonologie printed in 1597….


But most importantly he would have known about it from James himself…

Because in 1599 Shakespeare visited Scotland!

William Guthrie of Brechin, the great Scottish historian, wrote in 1767:

King James, to prove how thoroughly he was now emancipated from the tutelage of his clergy, desired Elizabeth to send him in the year of 1599 a company of English actors. She complied, and James gave them a licence to act in his capital, and in his court.  I have great reason to think that the immortal Shakespeare was of the number….

 Putting together information from contemporary sources, this is what happened in Scotland 1589 – or appeared to have happened…..

 Within the town of Trenent in the Kingdom of Scotland, there dwelleth one David Seaton, who being deputy Bailiff in the said town, had a maid servant called Gillis Duncan, who used secretly to be absent and to lie forth of her Master’s house every other night: she took in hand to help all such as were troubled or grieved with any kind of sickness or infirmity: and in short space did perform many matters most miraculous, which things, forasmuch as she began to do them upon a sudden, having never done the like before, made her Master and others to be in great admiration, and wondered thereat: by means wherof Seaton had his maid in some great suspicion, that she did not those things by natural and lawful ways, but rather supposed it to be done by some extraordinary and unlawful means…..


Witchcraft! The fact that Gillis was setting out to heal the sick and the infirm – and that she had ‘miraculous’ success with this – was neither here nor there.

She was exercising powers way beyond those of a serving –maid, so she must be in league with the Devil!

At this point her master, Seton….

……put thumbscrews upon her fingers and bound her head with a rope, which is a most cruel torment . Yet would she not confess anything, whereupon they suspecting that she had been marked by the Devil (as commonly witches are) made diligent search about her, and found the enemy’s mark to be in the forepart of her throat. She confessed that all her doings was done by the wicked allurements and enticements of the Devil and that she did them by witchcraft.

Every single witchcraft examination in Scotland at this time followed the same pattern. No witch EVER confessed voluntarily – or even when she was being tortured. It was only when the Devil’s mark was found that she admitted to being a witch. The Devil was said to kiss witches to seal his pact with them and his tongue left a permanent mark…..

But, of course, if you are looking for a body-mark that you are convinced is there, then you’ll find it. And once the mark is found, the game is up: the woman might as well confess she is a witch to stop the pain.

Gillis now began to name names and a literal witch hunt began. It soon became clear that the top witch was called Agnes Sampson….

….commonly called the wise wife of Keith, a woman not of the base and ignorant sort of witches, but matron-like, grave and settled in her answers. In her examination she declared…..

AGNES SAMPSON (Amanda Walker)

I have a familiar spirit, who when I call ‘Holla Master!, appears in animal form, and resolves me of any doubtful matter, especially concerning the life or death of persons lying sick….


So that’s why Shakespeare’s witches were martyrs to their pets! They were powerful spirits in animal form.

witch feeding toads

Agnes had spent her life doing good – most of the time. Like Gillis, she healed people, often using Christian prayers, creeds and Ave Marias – and sometimes even transferred their illnesses to herself.

But if people paid her to do evil, she did evil.

She was a hired gun…

She claimed she had made a pact with the Devil out of economic necessity: her husband had died, leaving her penniless, with children to support, in the middle of a famine. Satan had appeared to her in the form of a black dog and told her that if she worked for him he would make her, and her children, rich.

She could also have revenge on her enemies. This last offer seems to have been particularly appealing.

To Agnes, it was a no-brainer.

To have the Devil as her sponsor would give her massive prestige in the area – with the nobility as well as ordinary people. With royalty, even…

King James himself, it seems, was one of her clients.

james nin 1595

He wanted to marry Anne of Denmark.

anne denmark min 1595

He much preferred young men, but he needed to ensure his succession.

However, every time Anne sailed from Denmark, her ship was driven back by storms.

James was staying at Seton at the time – so he could spot Anne’s ship when it sailed down the Firth of Forth. This was only six miles away from the village of Haddington where Agnes was living. She claimed ‘The Sprite’ – the Devil – had told her that Anne would only arrive safely in Scotland if James went to fetch her himself – and she passed on this information to King James.

A timorous, hesitating man, he acted entirely out of character. Like a hero of romance, he risked the storms at sea to claim his bride. The royal couple enjoyed an extended honeymoon at in Norway and Denmark.

But when they returned to Scotland they encountered stormy weather at sea….

north berwick witches (2)

Agnes, as part of the witch-hunt, was now being blamed for these storms – and when James heard about this, he had her brought to Holyrood House so he could examine her himself. He ordered her to be tortured and her hair shaved off, so he could look for the Devil’s mark. Sure enough he found it…

KING JAMES (Mike Burnside)

…..upon her privities…….


…..and only then did Agnes confess.


Upon the night of Allhallows Even last, I was with a great many other witches, to the number of two hundredth. We all together went by sea, each one in a sieve…


Just like the witches in Macbeth……


…….with flagons of wine, making merry and drinking by the way to the Kirk of North Berwick in Lothian.

north berwick witches (5)

After we landed, we took hands and danced this reel or short dance, singing all with one voice….

 Commer go ye before, commer go ye, If you’ll not go before, commer let me…….

Gillis Duncan went before us playing this reel upon a small trump, called a Jew’s Harp, until we entered the Kirk….


These confessions, says The Newes from Scotland, made the King in a wonderful admiration and sent for the said Gillis Duncan, who upon the like trump did play the said dance before the King’s Majesty.


The Devil was already at the Kirk, attending our coming in the habit or likeness of a man, and seeing that we tarried over long, he enjoined us all to a penance, which was, that we should kiss his buttocks: which being put over the pulpit bare, we all did as he said…

north berwick witches

The Devil also told them to dig up bodies in the graveyard and to use bits of them – properly dried and prepared of course – for magical spells.

But even King James’s credulity snapped when, according to the pamphlet.

Agnes Sampson confessed before the Kings Majesty sundry things which were so miraculous and strange his Majesty said…..


You are all extreme liars!


I dinna wish you to believe my words are false! I want you to believe them. I will discover such matter to you as Your Majesty should not any way doubt of….


And thereupon, taking his Majesty a little aside, she declared unto him the very words which passed between the Kings Majesty and his Queen at Oslo in Norway the first night of their marriage, with their answer each to other: whereat the King’s Majesty wondered greatly, and swore…..


By the living God, I believe that all the Devils in hell could not have discovered this! Your words are true.


Agnes then confessed she had been part of a witchcraft conspiracy to kill the king….


I took a black Toad, and did hang the same up by the heels, three days, and collected and gathered the venom as it dropped and fell from it into an oyster shell. I kept the same venom close covered, until I should obtain a part or piece of foul linen cloth, that had appertained to Your Majesty……


She means his dirty old underpants…


I would then have bewitched you to death, and put you to such extraordinary pains, as if you had been lying upon sharp thorns and ends of needles.


Agnes also admitted that, working in concert with a group of other witches, she had christened a cat, tied body parts to it and threw it into the sea. The first time it had swum back – so they went to sea in  their sieves and threw it further out. It was this act of magic that had raised the tempest on King James’s return from Denmark and caused James’s ship to have a wind contrary to the other ships in his party, which the King acknowledged was….


Most strange and true….


Agnes then tried to save her skin with a bit of flattery….


…Your Majesty had never come safely from the sea, if your faith had not prevailed above our intentions….


But it was too little and too late. Agnes was first strangled, then burnt at the stake. Her naked, hairless ghost is said to haunt Holyrood House to this day….

witches burnt at stake

But why had she raised a storm against the King’s return? People in the past have argued that the Scottish witches didn’t want a Danish Queen: but we KNOW from Macbeth that Scottish witches at the time WEREN’T patriotic.

They were available to the highest bidder!

And Agnes and her colleagues had been hired by a very high bidder indeed – Francis Stewart, 5th Earl of Bothwell – King James’s cousin and Chancellor – and his greatest enemy.

Bothwell wanted to be King of Scotland.

While James was cavorting with young men, he was easy to manipulate: but when he decided to found a dynasty, he had to go. So while he was on his honeymoon, Bothwell paid every witch in the area to destroy the King. That’s why they met with the Devil in the Kirk at North Berwick….

And that’s why Agnes Sampson switched sides….

But I can hear you thinking………..

Bare-bottomed Devils? Sea-borne sieves? Talking dogs? Drowned cats, body parts and storms? What on earth was going on?

To find out WHAT WAS going on, read ……PART TWO..














It’s best to read Part One and Part Two first…..

The dark side of Queen Elizabeth was very much in the minds of Catholics in the months leading up to Love’s Labour’s Lost….

In the same month that she visited Titchfield (September, 1591) Richard Topcliffe – Elizabeth’s hangman – told Thomas Pormont….

…….(a Catholic priest he was torturing on a rack set up in his own home)..

……that he was so great and familiar with her Majesty that he many times putteth his hands between her breasts and paps, and in her neck; that he hath not only seen her legs and knees, but feeleth them with his hands above her knees; that he hath felt her belly, and said unto Her Majesty that she hath the softest belly of any womankind…..

 Topcliffe also claimed that Elizabeth  had said:

…….Be not these the arms legs and body of King Henry?……..

To which he had answered…..


Topcliffe also said that Elizabeth….

…..gave him for a favour a white linen hose wroughte with white silk etc.

Topcliffe also claimed that he that he was……

……so familiar with her that when he pleaseth to speak with her he may take her away from any company, and that she is as pleasant with every one that she doth love…..


……that he did not care for the Council, for he had his authority from Her Majesty.

Pormont managed to record and smuggle out these notes to his fellow Catholics…..

…….including the Jesuit missionary and propagandist Robert Persons…..

robert persons

……who was to have a big influence on Love’s Labour’s Lost.

Indeed, he is even mentioned by name in the play!

Jaquenetta, the wench, brings a letter she believes Don Armado has sent her, to Sir Nathaniel, the curate, to read….

She says:

God give you good morrow M. Person….

To which Nathaniel replies:

Maister Person, quasi Person? And if one should be perst, which is the one.

(Note: In modern additions, this line is give to Holoferenes – but in the Quarto and First Folio editions it is given to Holofernes.)p-erson parson love's labour's lost quarto 001

Jaquenetta, as can be seen from the above, then switches names for the curate:

Good M. Parson be so good as read me this letter….

This, The Shakespeare Code believes, was a dangerous in-joke for the Catholic recusants in the audience….


In 1592 he was to write a pseudonymous attack, in Latin, on Sir Walter Raleigh………

raleigh with pearls


An Advertisement Written to a Secretary of my Lord Treasurers of England, by an English intelligencer as he passed through Germany towards Italy.

The English summary, which was published alongside it, claims that Raleigh presided over………

……..a school of atheism………….

…. in which, under direction of the astronomer and mathematician Thomas Harriot….

thomas harriot

…….whom the book describes as a ‘conjurer’…

……..both Moses and our Saviour, the old and the new testament are jested at, and the scholars taught among other things to spell God backward…..

In Love’s Labour’s Lost ‘the school of atheism’ becomes, in the King of Navarre’s words…..

……The school of Night…..

……..and the blasphemy of writing…..

….God backward…

(…to produce…


…..is satirised in an exchange between the educated infant, Moth….

……and Holofernes…..


Yes, yes; he teaches boys the hornbook. What is a,
b, spelt backward, with the horn on his head?


Ba, pueritia, with a horn added.


Ba, most silly sheep with a horn. You hear his learning.

Persons also wrote his Responsio later in November 1591…..

This was a reply to Elizabeth’s famous 1591……

……Declaration of Great Troubles Pretended against the Realm by a number of Seminary Priests and Jesuits…..

……written on 18th October, by Lord Burghley, but not published till November….

In the ‘Declaration’ the designs of Spain and Rome on England were exposed and it was asserted that….

………the Jesuits form the nests and lurking places of those who are in rebellion against [Elizabeth’s] person, that their General has  been to Spain and armed its King against her, that Parsons who taught amongst them and was the general of the English seminary at Rome has done the same and that the Jesuits as a Society has been the life and soul of the enemies which had been raised against England.

Persons/Parsons, replying to this personal attack, countered by describing Elizabeth as…….

……the defender of the Calvinian heresy….

…..and pointed out that King Philip of Spain……


….. had saved her life when she had been imprisoned in the Tower by her half-sister, Mary Tudor……….

Mary Tudor

Persons claimed that Elizabeth’s Anglican priests were…..

…..the dregs of mankind….

…..whereas the young Catholic missionaries, who were accused by Elizabeth of being traitors, were often from noble English families.

Persons chose as his text……

……And I saw a woman drunk with the blood of saints and the blood of martyrs of Jesus.

The events of the next month were to suggest Persons was right……

On 10th December, Swithin Wells….

wells swithin

……a great friend of the Southampton family who had taught at Titchfield…..

…… had recruited Catholic missionary priests…..

…..was hanged outside the Southampton family home in London….

…..together with Edmund Genings…..NPG D25344,Edmund Geninges,by M. Bas

……a young man who had been fast-tracked to a priesthood at Rheims…..

……who was also drawn and quartered…..

hanged drawn and quartered

At Genings’s hearing……….

…..to make him a scoffe to the people………..

…….the authorities had………..

………….vested him again, not with his priestly garments, but (almost as King Herod and Pilates soldiers did our Saviour) with a ridiculous  fool’s coat, which they found in Mr. Wells his house, and when they had so altered him, they laughing told him, he was more fit in that attire to be presented to the Queen for a jester, then to a Nun for a Confessor.

The Shakespeare Code believes that it was this incident that caused Shakespeare to describe the Catholic martyrs in Sonnet 124 as……

………..the fools of time,
Which die for goodness, who have lived for crime.

See: Shakespeare in Italy

But there was another Jesuit missionary who also had a profound effect on Shakespeare…..

……..whom he describes as his…..

…….loving cousin, W.S……

He  influenced Shakespeare’s imagery, vocabulary and thought.

He was Robert Southwell.


[See Shakespeare, the Earl and the Jesuit (2008) a brilliant book by the distinguished American Shakespeare scholar, John Klause.]

In 1587 Southwell wrote his Epistle of Comfort for the wife of Philip Howard, 20th Earl of Arundel…..

philip howard earl of arundel

…….a Catholic convert who from 1585 had been under sentence of death in the Tower.

In it Southwell writes about the glory of martyrdom…..


He writes:

Then as regards to the Queen (to whom I have never done nor wished any evil) I have daily prayed for her and now with all my heart do pray that from his great mercy, through the wounds and most worthy merits of Christ his son, He may grant that she may use the ample gifts and endowments wherewith He has endowed her to the immortal glory of her name, the prosperity of the whole nation and the eternal welfare of her whole soul and body……

Southwell also responded to Elizabeth’s 1591 Declaration with……..

…..An Humble Supplication to Her Majesty………..

……..never published, but circulated in manuscript.

 Southwell makes the same point about the Anglican clergy that Persons made…..

…..that though the Catholic priests numbered only one tenth of the Protestant priests, they had….

……….happily more gentlemen than in all the other clergy of the whole realm.

He vividly describes the torture Elizabeth’s officers use……….

……sleep deprivation and mutilation of….

………….those parts that it is almost a torture for Christian ears to hear it. Let it then be judged what it was to chaste and modest men to endure it the shame being no les offensive to their mind than the pain, though most excessive to their bodies.

But, unlike Persons, Southwell firmly believed that Elizabeth was opposed to such cruelties herself. He addressed the Queen with…. 

…..the most formal respect, acknowledging her as an anointed sovereign, and presenting his arguments as if she knew nothing of the barbarous treatment ordered by her ministers.

He called her…….

………most merciful Princess………

……and made a direct, personal appeal to her……..

……gracious self……………….

……to bring her back to Catholicism.

In Love’s Labour’s Lost Shakespeare, like Southwell, gives Elizabeth the benefit of the doubt.

The Princess of France is not a sadist…..

…..drunk with the blood of the martyrs of Jesus.

She is simply morally compromised by her pursuit of fame.

She kills deer because she wants to be recognised as a skilled hunter.

We have seen how

…..the poor deer……..

……which is spelt…..

……the poore Deare…

…..in the 1599 Quarto version of the play…


princess's speech quarto love's labour's lost. 001 (2)

…..can symbolise…..

(1) …the literal deer which Elizabeth slew on her Progresses….


(2) ….the men who are ‘slain’ by the beauty of Elizabeth.

…..as the song in the Cowdray Progress demonstrates….

See Part Two

But it is the view of The Shakespeare Code that there are……




Elizabeth once discussed her posthumous fame – her legacy – with her ladies-in-waiting…………..

elizabeth with laidies-in-waiting.

…..and said on the subject of her epitaph:

I am no lover of pompous title, but only desire that my name may be recorded in a line or two, which shall briefly express my name, my virginity, the years of my reign, the reformation of religion under it, and my preservation of peace.

And the inscription on her actual tomb begins with:

Sacred to memory: Religion to its primitive purity restored….

So the fame that Elizabeth most earnestly sought was as the reformer of religion…..

Tomb of Queen Elizabeth

 ………and it was this longing….

……for praise, an outward part….

…….that caused her to….


The poore Deare’s blood….

So what or who was the ‘poore Deare’?


In August 1581, Robert Persons was working as a missionary in England, disguised as a soldier.

He wrote:

It is the custom of the Catholics themselves to take to the woods and thickets, to ditches and holes even, for concealment, when their houses are broken into at night.

Sometimes when we are sitting at table quite cheerfully, conversing familiarly about matters of faith or piety…it happens that someone rings at the front door a little more insistently than usual, so he can be put down as an official.

Immediately, like deer that have heard the voice of hunters and prick their ears and become alert, all stand to attention and stop eating and command themselves to God in the briefest of prayers; no word or sound of any sort is heard  until the servants report what is the matter….

The deer as an image of  Roman Catholics was an old one….

…….as can be seen in one of Rome’s earliest basilicas…….

……..of deers drinking from the waters of spiritual truth…..

deer drinking water

…….in reference to Psalm 41………

…As the hart panteth after the water brooks, so panteth my soul after thee……..

So spilling….

…..the poore Deare’s blood….

…..is a reference to Elizabeth’s bloody execution of Catholic Martyrs…..

….the fools of time….

…..like Wells and Genings.


When John Dryden……

John Dryden portrait...National Portrait Gallery handout of a newly-discovered painting of John Dryden, the first Poet Laureate, which went on public show at the gallery today. PRESS ASSOCIATION Photo. Issue date: Wednesday April 15, 2009. The oil is believed to have been painted when Dryden was appointed in 1668, to celebrate the creation of the post. It was painted by Charles II's court artist Michael John Wright and was bought by the NPG for 225,000, with help from The Art Fund charity, which donated 45,000. See PA story ARTS Dryden. Photo credit should read: National Portrait Gallery/PA Wire

….. recorded his conversion to Catholicism, he did so in a poem entitled…..

The Hind and the Panther…………


A milk-white Hind, immortal and unchanged

………represented the Catholic Church…….

…….. and the  panther, the Church of England.

Dryden was drawing on a on a long tradition of equating the deer with Christianity…….

………..which before the reformation meant only Catholicism.

So spilling….

…..the poore Deare’s blood….

….can also mean destroying the Roman Catholic Church….

….which is exactly what Elizabeth intended to do.


But the deer was also thought to kill snakes….

stag killing snake

It miraculously drew them out of holes with its breath…..


stag drawing serpent breath of its nostrils

……and trampled them underfoot.

So the deer was also an image of Christ himself….

…..(destroying the Devil and all his works)….

…..and often appeared with a crucifix between his horns……

saint eustace with deer

George Herbert……

george herbert

………born the year after the premiere of Love’s Labour’s Lost…..

……in his great poem Love….

Lover bade me welcome

But my soul drew back,

Guilty of dust and sin……….

……uses the phrase………..

……..my dear……..

….when he is addressing Christ….

…..and this equation of the deer and Christ has its roots in the Christianised interpretation of The Song of Solomon…..

My lover is like a swift gazelle or a young dear….

So when the Princess of France….

….spills the poore Deare’s blood….

…..it can also refer to Elizabeth’s re-crucifying Christ himself……

….. when she kills his Catholic followers…..

……and tries to destroy the Old Faith….

We can never know how many Catholics in Shakespeare’s audience picked up these coded references…..

……but they seem to have been forgotten by the time the First Folio was published in 1623…..

….or deliberately suppressed after the Catholic Gunpowder Plot.

Here the spelling of…..


….is changed back to its more usual spelling…..


princess speech folio love's labour's 001

By then, Catholicism in Britain was seen as a lost cause….


Robert Southwell was himself arrested the month after the first performance of Love’s Labour’s Lost.  

Topcliffe tortured  him ten times, then hanged him in 1595.

He had intended to draw and quarter him alive as well: but Southwell cut a figure of such dignity and bravery on the scaffold that the crowd, led by Charles Blount, recently created Lord Mountjoy, insisted that Southwell be hanged till he was dead.

Some accounts say Mountjoy – who played Longaville in the play…..

See: ‘Love’s Labour’s Lost’ revisited: Aristocratic Actors.

…..pulled on Southwell’s legs himself.

If Mountjoy was in the crowd, it is highly likely that Southwell’s ‘loving cousin, W.S.’ was there as well.

Southwell prayed for the Queen on the scaffold.

We don’t know if he still believed that Elizabeth was unaware of the tortures that Topcliffe inflicted: but he would have been horrified by the letter about him Topcliffe sent to the Queen in June, 1592, for her….

…. pleasure.

He describes how Southwell would be manacled at the wrists….

…….his feet standing upon the ground and his hands, but as high as he can reach against the wall. It will be as though he were dancing a trick or a figure at trenchmore.

Trenchmore was a lively dance….




 Brothers and Sisters of the Code might be interested in reading:

‘Love’s Labour’s Lost’: The Background.
‘Love’s Labour’s Lost’: The Original Cast.
‘Love’s Labour’s Lost’: Aristocratic Actors.








Brothers and Sisters of The Shakespeare Code…

It is with tearful pride that…

….Stewart Trotter….

(No Image Available)

….Trixie the Cat….


…the MYSTERIOUS Tom ‘X’….

tom X

…..and all our NECESSARILY ANONYMOUS Secret Agents….

…announce that…

….on Friday, 25th September, 2015….

The Shakespeare Code…

…..received its….

200,000th View!!!

Thanks to all our Honoured Subscribers and Readers…

…..spread throughout the Globe…..



Clare Shepherd writes…..

Well done, Stewart. I do hope you are thinking of writing another book, as you little volume lives with my Shakespeare volumes. I may have to get a new copy soon, as the old one is getting a bit battered from frequent use. I love your blog. Thanks for keeping it going.

Stewart Trotter replies….

Thank you for your inspiring comments, Clare.  They are much appreciated.

It’s best to read Part One first…..


……is a Calvinist…..

……who believes in pre-destination….

The Forester says to her:

Nothing but fair is that which you inherit……

…and the Princess replies……

See, see my beauty will be saved by merit!

O heresy in fair, fit for these days!

A giving hand, though foul, shall have fair praise.

The heresy referred to is a Roman Catholic one.

The Catholics believed that good works – including charity – were one of the ways to salvation……..

…..but Calvinists believed that good works…..

….a giving hand….

….could NOT save you from Hell.

You could only enter heaven if you were one of God’s….



….like the Princess of France….

…..was  a Calvinist…..

She had been taught the doctrines of Calvin, by her stepmother, Henry VIII’s sixth wife, Katherine Parr.

katherine parr 2

When Elizabeth’s half-sister, Mary Tudor….

Mary Tudor

…..had locked her in the Tower, she prayed to God top release her.

When God, in her mind, not only released her……

….. but made her Queen of England as well…..

……she was convinced that she was one of his ‘Elect’.


…..is handed a cross-bow……

…..and shoots deer from a stand erected in the park of the King of Navarre.

In reality, Queen Elizabeth would have used a cross-bow.

(In reality, Queen Elizabeth would have used a cross-bow.)

In doing this she admits that she must….

….play the murderer….

….and ponders the paradox that, although she is the embodiment of


….she is prepared to take a helpless creature’s life….

In these circumstances shooting…..

…… well……

…..and killing the deer is judged to be morally


……because the deer dies.

The Princes says:

But come, the bow: now mercy goes to kill,

And shooting well is then accounted ill.

She wants to be considered a good shot….

….so has her excuses ready if she fails to kill the deer.

(1) If  she doesn’t hit the deer at all……

……it was pity that stopped her from doing so…..

(2) If she wounds the deer, but does not kill it……

……it was because she would rather be praised for her shooting skills than any wish to see the deer dead.

Thus will I save my credit in the shoot:

Not wounding, pity would not let me do’t;

If wounding, then it was to show my skill,

That more for praise than purpose meant to kill.

She then goes on to explain that a desire for glory can lead people to perform dark actions that other people hate….

…..when for the sake of fame, for the praise of others, for external approval….

….we ignore our instinctive, human sympathies.

And out of question so it is sometimes,

Glory grows guilty of detested crimes,

When, for fame’s sake, for praise, an outward part,

We bend to that the working of the heart.

The Princess admits that it is this need for praise which drives her to spill the blood of the deer…

….with whose plight she begins to empathise……

…..and to whom she  feels no animosity….

As I for praise alone now seek to spill

The poor deer’s blood, that my heart means no ill.

Boyet criticises………….

……and eroticises………..

….. the Princess’s hunting by comparing her to shrewish wives who also crave praise for dominating their husbands….

(Death and blood could be Elizabethan symbols for orgasm and semen)

princess 7

Do not curst wives hold that self-sovereignty

Only for praise sake, when they strive to be

Lords o’er their Lords…

But  the Princess defends female dominance over men..

…..praise we may afford

To any Lady that subdues a Lord.


In other of his poems and plays, Shakespeare introduces characters who are HIGHLY CRITICAL of hunting……..

…….and empathise  with the suffering of the animals.

In Venus and Adonis…….

Venus and Adonis

…….Venus begs her young lover Adonis not to hunt the dangerous boar….

… but to hunt the harmless hare instead….

But as the poem goes on, Venus argues against herself.

She begins to sympathise with the terror of the hare, ‘Poor Wat’….

And when thou [Adonis] hast on foot the purblind hare,
Mark the poor wretch, to overshoot his troubles
How he outruns the wind and with what care
He cranks and crosses with a thousand doubles:
The many musets through the which he goes
Are like a labyrinth to amaze his foes…..

By this, poor Wat, far off upon a hill,
Stands on his hinder legs with listening ear,
To harken if his foes pursue him still:
Anon their loud alarums he doth hear;
And now his grief may be compared well
To one sore sick that hears the passing-bell…..

There is also a celebrated description of the death of a deer in As You Like It…

 Duke Senior says:

Come, shall we go and kill us venison?
And yet it irks me the poor dappled fools,
Being native burghers of this desert city,
Should, in their own confines, with forked heads
Have their round haunches gor’d.

The First Lord replies….

To-day my Lord of Amiens and myself
Did steal behind Jacques as he lay along
Under an oak whose antique root peeps out
Upon the brook that brawls along this wood!
To the which place a poor sequest’red stag,
That from the hunter’s aim had ta’en a hurt,
Did come to languish; and, indeed, my lord,
The wretched animal heav’d forth such groans
That their discharge did stretch his leathern coat
Almost to bursting; and the big round tears
Cours’d one another down his innocent nose
In piteous chase; and thus the hairy fool,
Much marked of the melancholy Jaques,
Stood on th’ extremest verge of the swift brook,
Augmenting it with tears.

Most Elizabethan men – especially aristocrats – were addicted to hunting……

They couldn’t wait to leave smelly, noisy London and get back to their estates….

But even though Shakespeare was a country-man……

……and his father a butcher as well as a glover…….

…….it seems Shakespeare himself was deeply disturbed by the wounding and killing of animals.



…like the Princess of France…..

……also shot deer, with a cross-bow, from specially erected stands…….

……..both at Titchfield…….


……where the Groom of the Chamber had been instructed to build……

…..two standings for her Majesty…..

…..and at Cowdray…..Cowdray Castle

……the estate of Mary Southampton’s father, Viscount Montague……

…… which Queen Elizabeth also visited on her 1591 Progress.

The deer were rounded up and run before her into a small enclosure…..

…a degraded form of hunting devised by her father, Henry VIII….

henry VIII 2.

….when he grew too fat to ride a horse…

At Cowdray music had accompanied the slaughter….

 ….a delicate bower…

…….had been prepared to house…

….her Highnesse musicians….

….(the dark-skinned Bassano family, which included Aemilia…..

….. who was shortly to become the ‘Dark Lady of the Sonnets’…)

A nymph…..

……(possibly the mixed-race Aemilia)

…..handed Elizabeth a decorated crossbow…..

…..just as the Princess in the play is handed one before her ‘Now mercy goes to kill’ speech….

[Note: Queen Elizabeth left this bow at Cowdray as a memento of her visit.

It is The Code’s belief that it was THIS VERY BOW that was used in the production of Love’s Labour’s Lost at Titchfield.

Everyone would recognise that the bow presented to the Princess in the play…..

…..when she says….

……..but come, the bow….

 …..was the bow presented to Queen Elizabeth at Cowdray.]

The nymph in the entertainment then sang…..

….a sweet song….

….which eroticises the hunt….

….as Boyet does in Love’s Labour’s Lost…..

Goddess and monarch of this happy Isle,

Vouchsafe this bow which is an huntress part ;

Your eyes are arrows though they seem to smile

Which never glanced but galled the stateliest heart [hart],

Strike one, strike all, for none at all can fly,

They gaze you in the face although they die.

‘Strike one, strike all’ is a reference to the Southampton family motto….

…..to be found on the family tomb at St. Peter’s Church in Titchfield….

st. peter's titchfield

Une par tout…..

…One for all….

tomb coat of arms

So young Harry Southampton……

tomb henry wriothesley

….. was certainly in attendance.

It was HIS……

…stateliest heart…

…that the song refers to…….

….. because he was being set up by his family as a future ‘favourite’ of Elizabeth….

 As in Love’s Labour’s Lost, the song equates images of hunting and death…..

….with falling in love and orgasm….

They gaze you in the face although they die….

It suggests that Elizabeth’s beauty is so great that men will reach a sexual climax just by the act of looking at her!

Elizabeth shot four deer at Cowdray…..

……..but Lord Montague’s sister had the temerity to shoot one as well.

For her impertinence she was denied a place at dinner that night…


Later in the week the Queen…..

….viewing my Lord’s walks…..

….. came across a Pilgrim…

…clad in a coat of russet velvet….his hat being of the same, with scallop shells of cloth of silver…

Hailing the Queen as…

…fairest of all creatures…

…he tells her of a marvellous oak tree hung with ornaments.

She follows  him and finds the tree hung with her own arms and the arms of all the….

Noblemen and gentlemen of that Shire….

A wild man appears and compares the mighty oak to Elizabeth, protected by her noblemen and gentlemen.

Abroad the Queen’s courage has made her feared: but at home it is her….



…the owner of this grove hath tasted….that hath made her loved……..

Montague had joined the Rebellion of the  Catholic Northern Lords against Elizabeth in 1569…..

…..but instead of chopping off his head, Elizabeth had made him a Lord Lieutenant…….

So, Montague’s entertainment for Elizabeth, like Love’s Labour’s Lost, acknowledges both the dark and light sides of Elizabeth……

……her delight in killing………

…..(once, in 1574, she had slaughtered 27 deer IN A SINGLE DAY at Berkley Castle)

berkeley castle

But also her mercy in pardoning Lord Montague’s life……

…..mercy which was in short supply in the months leading up to the first production of Love’s Labour’s Lost…

 Part Three, the conclusion, follows shortly…..

…and the killing of the deer DECODED….






Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 63 other followers